Product Description

Removal of iron, manganese and heavy metal Usually traditional method adopts manganese ore, but the traditional method has obvious disadvantages: 1.Before filtration, the original water need to be strongly aerated by oxygen, an aeration tank must be built. The tank will occupy a big space. But aeration is not necessary if using ***** and the occupied area is only 1/3 of using manganese ore. ***** ore’s bulk specific weight is 2 times higher than F. F’s due to low specific density (less than 1). Manganese ore is easy to get hard, or forms short-circuit flow. The filtration result will be strongly affected. But F. F’s bulk specific weight is closed to water’s and it never gets hard. ***** ore needs to be changed in 2 years, but ***** usually won’t be changed at least in *0 years, just be regenerated. The regeneration period can be calculated according to the parameter of original water which you provide to me. ***** stream of water has to be *0m/h up when manganese ore is back purged, but the stream of water just is *0m/h when ***** is back-purged, more than *0% energy will be saved, so cost performance of ***** is *0 times more than manganese ore’s. 5.***** composite molecular sieve can remove Fe2+ and Fe3+ at same time. When the water through *****, Fe2+ and other heavy metals ions will exchange with Na+ on the *****’s surface. Then Fe2+ is removed. Fe3+ is mechanically filtered like using Manganese ore. The removal rate is higher than *6%.